A group of Ann Arbor VA clinicians and researchers are bringing attention to the respiratory health of deployed Veterans. Following deployments to Southwest Asia, many Veterans were exposed to a multitude of respiratory hazards including military burn pits, sand and dust storms, diesel fumes and sulfur dioxide.

The challenges associated with identifying these health problems were depicted in The New England Journal of Medicine’s “Clinical Problem-Solving” series in which two of Ann Arbor VA pulmonologists describe the evaluation and treatment of a Veteran experiencing breathing difficulty after exposure to burn pits.

The article, titled “A Burning Question,” is a journal entry that walks the reader through the medical issues the patient is reporting followed by the doctor’s step-by-step diagnosis and treatment recommendations for the patient.

Condition of interest to a lot of Veterans

“We thought this would be a good opportunity for doctors and patients to learn about a condition we are concerned about, that we know is out there, and is of interest to a lot of Veterans,” said Dr. Alexander Rabin, co-author of the article and pulmonologist for Ann Arbor VA.

The article describes a 35-year-old post-9/11-era Veteran experiencing shortness of breath, coughing and a burning sensation in the airways that developed after two deployments to Iraq. During those deployments, the Veteran was routinely exposed to burning paper, cardboard, electronics, used medical supplies, tires and discarded food.

The Veteran also helped burn human waste by igniting it with JP-8 in a 50-gallon drum. No personal protective equipment was used and the Veteran reported coughing and phlegm production while carrying out these assignments.

“Not all that wheezes is asthma.”

The Veteran was initially diagnosed with asthma and was prescribed albuterol to use before exercise but continued to struggle even with regular use of the medication.

“There’s a saying in medicine: ‘Not all that wheezes is asthma,’” said Dr. Rabin.

Rabin and Dr. John Osterholzer, pulmonologist, interpreted the testing that had been performed on the Veteran. Compared to other people who were similar in age, the tests showed the Veteran’s lungs were only working at about 60% of the normal predicted value.

“Usually, anyone that has a predicted value of 80% or above is considered normal.” said Osterholzer. “It’s an indication that something was wrong. The pattern of abnormalities can give us some clues of what might be wrong.”

While the tests did confirm the Veteran had diminished lung capacity, the symptoms were not consistent with asthma. A CT scan and lung biopsy were completed which showed scarring of the small airways, a condition called constrictive bronchiolitis.

Symptoms significantly improved

Now that the doctors had a better understanding of the injuries in the Veteran’s lungs, they were able to adjust his treatment by prescribing him new medications and pulmonary rehabilitation. After two years of treatment and therapy, the Veteran reported his symptoms of shortness of breath and cough had significantly improved.

The doctors conclude their article by noting, “This case underscores the importance of asking about a patient’s exposures, including those during military service and pursing comprehensive evaluation in cases in which initial testing does not yield a diagnosis that adequately account for the clinical picture.”

Essay promoting the PACT Act

In August 2022, Congress passed the Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act. The PACT Act acknowledges that military deployment to Southwest Asia may have resulted in multiple types of cancer and respiratory conditions.

To acknowledge and promote the passage of the PACT Act, Rabin and Osterholzer partnered with team members Dr. Deborah Heaney, environmental health specialist, and program manager Rachel Howard.

They published an essay titled “A Sacred Obligation: Meeting the Needs of Veterans with Airborne Hazard Exposures” in the journal “The Annals of the American Thoracic Society.”

The essay highlights the frustrations Veterans often express when they perceive their health concerns are not being adequately addressed. The authors describe how the PACT Act will better acknowledge and address those concerns proactively.

Sign up in Open Burn Pit Registry

Rather than waiting for definitive proof linking the exposures with a list of over 20 medical conditions including cancers and respiratory diseases, the PACT Act identifies them as being “presumptive” conditions that are eligible for service connections.  This and other aspects of the legislation greatly expands exposed Veterans’ access to VA health care and benefits for Vietnam, Gulf War and Post-9/11 Veterans.

Veterans who feel they were exposed to hazardous materials or smoke during their military services are encouraged to sign up and complete the questionnaire in VA’s Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry.

The clinicians and researchers in this article participate in the Post-Deployment Cardiopulmonary Evaluation Network.

To read more stories regarding the PACT Act, visit VA News and Information.

Topics in this story

Link Disclaimer

This page includes links to other websites outside our control and jurisdiction. VA is not responsible for the privacy practices or the content of non-VA Web sites. We encourage you to review the privacy policy or terms and conditions of those sites to fully understand what information is collected and how it is used.

Leave a comment

The comments section is for opinions and feedback on this particular article; this is not a customer support channel. If you are looking for assistance, please visit Ask VA or call 1-800-698-2411. Please, never put personally identifiable information (SSAN, address, phone number, etc.) or protected health information into the form — it will be deleted for your protection.

3 Comments

  1. Erin D'Eletto April 20, 2023 at 16:56

    Where have you been for more than a decade…
    Via lung biopsy, Constrictive bronchiolitis (CB) was diagnosed by Dr. Anthony Szema of Stony Brook Hospital and VAMC Northport NY more than 10 years ago when Congressman Tim Bishop NY-01 was the visionary leader and first member of Congress who drafted legislation that shut down DoD’s use of burn pits and that implemented the first Burn Pit Registry, together with Rosie Lopez of Burn Pits 360.
    Rep. Bishop and I worked diligently at that time to get the Dept of VA to recognize CB as a presumptive for service-connected disability due to burn pit exposure. Unfortunately, the VA fell flat…
    We also attempted to get SSA to recognize CB as a disability for service members and veterans, but SSA fell flat, as well.
    Although we lost more than 10 years on this front, it is good to know that service members and veterans are not waiting as long as in-country Vietnam veterans have in the VA recognizing Agent Orange exposure and related presumtives for their deserved service-connection.
    Thank you,
    Erin D’Eletto
    Former Senior Congressional Aide for Military and Veteran Affairs
    Office of Rep. Tim Bishop NY-01 (2002-2014)

  2. Matt April 19, 2023 at 17:27

    https://www.va.gov/files/2022-11/PACT%20Act%20Overview%20101_V11.7.22%201600hrs.pdf

    The above link does not work.
    Message reads ‘Can’t Be Found’.

  3. Julia E Peterson April 19, 2023 at 17:16

    Many veterans were exposed to similar hazards and were not stationed in Iraq. We don’t qualify for the PACT Act yet had the same exposures. Sad that the VA only considers other medical issues if the veteran was exposed to burn pits at specific bases.
    I have similar lung problems but got labeled with COPD when lung function tests indicated that wasn’t the case! One would think the VA doctors would have more training in military hazardous exposures in general not just burn pits & agent orange.
    What’s the difference between PACT Act exposures & having to work burning jet crash sites?

Comments are closed.

More Stories